On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 19:26:07 -0400 Manhong Dai via aur-general <aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
Hi Freswa,
Somebody pointed me to your reply in the list. I didn't even know that the request in the AUR request system was sent to this email list, nor I know such an email list existed.
I agree that you think you already gave enough explanation from your point of view. However, please think about it in my shoes, I I didn't even know such an email list existed before I sent the last request through the AUR website, and I just registered it about an hour ago to appeal. If you think I spammed this request system, I am sorry for it. But from my point of view, I have been extremely patient and following the ladder to appeal, because I didn't get any email or any response on the AUR website, which just says one word 'rejected'.
I am also a very responsive package maintainer. You can check out my other packages, as long as other people submitted a suggestion, I responded the second day, and accepted their suggestions.
In terms of the package SGE, I just searched my email again but didn't find any email saying that the package is marked as out-of-date. It will be hard to believe that a package that was submitted just four months ago is already marked as out of date. It worked on a cluster of all our Arch Linux nodes four months ago, and it is still working on the latest Arch Linux. It worked on both new node installation and old node upgrade . I would never have thought to check the AUR website to see if I am still a maintainer. All I got was the two emails, one saying it was disowned, the other saying it was adopted, and they are 19 minutes apart.
Now I understand that each AUR package maintainer should join the email list and keep watching it. Given this special circumstance, can I get the maintainer status for the package SGE back?
Best, Manhong
And the comment left on the AUR page, that you would have gotten a notification from? They were right, the PKGBUILD was in absolutely terrible shape. Nobody said it was out of date, just that it very, very badly needed fixing and you were ignoring it. You would have then gotten notifications on Sept 19th when it was first requested that it be orphaned, on Oct 6th when a second request the it be orphaned was filed, and on Oct 10th when it was requested for a 3rd time that it be orphaned. Note that none of those notifications require you to be subscribed to any mailing list. They were sent directly to you. With the state of the PKGBUILD and no response, removing the maintainer was the right thing to do, without question.