It was my advise to include "custom" for BSD and MIT licenses, so if this is an error, it is mine.
But I think having a "custom" in the license array makes it more clear where to look for the license file. from[1]: "The BSD, MIT, zlib/png and Python licenses are special cases and could not be included in the licenses package. For the sake of the
On 21/11/2009, Stefan Husmann <stefan-husmann@t-online.de> wrote: license array, it is treated as a common license (license=('BSD'), license=('MIT'), license=('ZLIB') and license=('Python')) but technically each one is a custom license because each one has its own copyright line. Any packages licensed under these four should have its own unique license stored in /usr/share/licenses/pkgname. Some packages may not be covered by a single license. In these cases, multiple entries may be made in the license array, e.g. license=('GPL' 'custom:name of license')." [1] - http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Building_Packages_in_Arch_Linux -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer