On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:49:32 +0200 Stefan Husmann <stefan-husmann@t-online.de> wrote:
Am 05.10.2010 17:40, schrieb Adam Hani Schakaki:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:48:10 -0500 Thomas Dziedzic <gostrc@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Adam Hani Schakaki <arch@krzd.net> wrote:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:28:16 -0500 Thomas Dziedzic <gostrc@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Adam Hani Schakaki <arch@krzd.net> wrote:
Hello, please orphan go-openoffice-el [1] and go-openoffice-es [2] since those are outdated for a long time but don't get updated.
Thanks in advance
Adam Hani Schakaki
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27124 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26321
Did you try contacting the maintainers?
Shouldn't they get an information if someone flags their package out of date? If not, I will try to contact them. I don't think that they didn't manage to update it since only the version number needs to be changed.
Adam Hani Schakaki
Usually I only orphan a package if the maintainer has been contacted by someone and they still haven't updated it. There could be many reasons as to why they didn't update (like forgetting), which is why I prefer friendly reminders first :)
Go-openoffice-el was already orphaned by Andrea Scarpino. I wrote an email on Sep 25, but got no answer until now. So I think go-openoffice-es can be orphaned, or not?
Adam Hani Schakaki
Let's give him another week or so.
Regards Stefan Nine days are over, still no reaction from sud_crow. Even his other packages don't get updated, many of them are outdated. There are packages not updated 2 years long and the latest update of sud_crow was in May 2010. So I think his other outdated packages should get orphaned, too, so that they can be updated. Please correct me, if I am wrong.
Adam Hani Schakaki