On 17.01.2018 19:51, Balló György via aur-general wrote:
The voting is over. Results:
Yes: 33 No: 5 Abstain: 5
This means that speps is no longer a Trusted User.
-- György Balló Trusted User
I'm no longer a TU so I can't see how active both speps and faidoc have been regarding participation in the votes. Yet the TU-Bylaws are pretty strict and given that Bluewind/Florian pointed out during the discussion period that both TUs had participated in proposal 99 that started on December 18 2017 which is in my TZ now exactly one month ago. Therefore the second requirement, to NOT do any special action on the AUR requiring TU privileges is not fulfilled, as participating in votes is exactly one of these TU privileges. Also the alternative option with inactivity due to non-participation in votes has been invalidated by this participation. Unless of course there have been six such votes before, again I can't see that nor if they themselves participated in the votes for proposal 100 and 101. So I question whether both votes 100 and 101 have been valid and should have been created at all as the requirements for a removal vote defined in the TU-Bylaws have not been fulfilled. The Bylaws don't exist without reason and these actions were initiated with references to them so I assume that we agree that they need to be respected as they currently are. If anyone sees the requirement to change the bylaws a new thread for a discussion about changing the bylaws can be started and depending on how this comes to an end it's possible to repeat such votes for faico and speps. Cheers, Thorsten, who resigned September 2017