On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:22 PM, SJ_UnderWater <webmaster0007@rcn.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia < palopezv@gmail.com> wrote: 2013/7/3 Xorg <xorgbreaker@gmail.com>
Hi everybody.
Developers don't use svn today (I have downloaded source from svn, we
can see 2010-09-18 v1.0 r344 the latest date in ChangeLog).
So, only libkqueue0 appears to be good. I suggest to merge libkqueue and libkqueue-svn into libkqueue0, and
then rename libkqueue0 into libkqueue, for example.
libkqueue is alive and well at http://sourceforge.net/p/libkqueue/ and the SVN repository is at http://sourceforge.net/p/libkqueue/code/ The latest checkin (r652) was on June 11 this year. You may want to contact the maintainer and see if he/she wants to orphan the packages for you to update, instead.
I see libkqueue-svn has been orphaned, you can adopt and update. About libkqueue{,0}, did you try contacting the maintainers? It would be better to have maintainer of libkqueue0 adopt libkqueue and then merge libkqueue0 into it. I'm CCing both of them.
Cheers,
-- Maxime I once tried to contact niQo about these Apple-sourced packages, but created my -0 variants to better conform to the standards so they could at least see what I was talking about; I also respond to flags pretty quickly. I notice now that stativ has summarily deleted libpthread_workqueue0 for which I don't have a backup, is this normal? I would have appreciated some notice. If niQo decides to orphan them, I will accept.
SJ
I will disown libkqueue in 2 weeks time provided there is no answer from niQo, then you can adopt it and we will proceed with the merge. Cheers, -- Maxime