Yes, I completely agree. Python Packages are right now a mess. Hector On 19 June 2011 09:08, Axilleas P <markeleas@gmail.com> wrote:
Just yesterday I adopted python-jinja2 [1]. There are also two other similar packages. One is python-jinja1 [2] and python3-jinja2 [3], relying on python2 and python3 respectively. So, my question is, shouldn't packages depended on python2 be renamed accordingly? In this case [1][2] to python2-jinja1/2 and [3] to just python-jinja2?
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41497 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26870 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38651
-- (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination. (> <) come join the dark side. /_|_\ (we have cookies.)
-- Hector MartÃnez-Seara Monné mail: hseara@gmail.com Tel: +34656271145 Tel: +358442709253