On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:31:37PM -0300, Angel Velásquez wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon <cmbrannon79@gmail.com> wrote:
Thomas Bächler wrote:
I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position instead of calling it "Semi-TU".
This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it.
Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be creating another level of permission in the AUR, and some rules about, if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?).
I'd give an AUR moderator all permissions to mess around in the AUR, be it packages of TUs or not. If somebody messes up, he/she can be punished later. -- Florian Friesdorf <flo@chaoflow.net> GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 Jabber/XMPP: flo@chaoflow.net OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC