On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Allan McRae firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Aaron Griffin wrote:
I've been thinking of this as well. It would require some design effort from the server side though, but wouldn't be too hard. Do we need full shell accounts for these users?
yes: Can be done in a minimal amount of time with very little changes to the dbscripts. Management headache with regard to TUs vote new people in periodically.
yes: People can stage their rebuilds.
no: Would require a restricted sftp process, or some daemon for file upload. Less management hassle, more code writing.
no: keeps updating packages the same as now (upload and forget). No manual db-script running.
For TUs who want to know how the main repo update procedure works, see http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:HOWTO_Be_A_Packager . The main difference to current [community] updating is that packages are uploaded to a staging area which requires you to run and extra script to actually push them to the repos.
If we are going to have a testing repo for community (which I think is overdue and this change would make easy to implement), I think TUs will need full shell access in order to move the packages from the testing repo to the main one.
Quick aside: Do we need ANOTHER testing repo for community, or could we use the same one?