hollunder@gmx.at wrote:
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:46:48 +1000 Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote:
I disagree. This same thing happens to me with my package "brasero-lite". It is brasero but without the gnome dependencies, and has the provides=('brasero'), but when I try and install a package that has brasero as a dependencie, such as sound-juicer, pacman attempts to install brasero, not realising that i allready have brasero-lite. This isn't a sound juicer fault, it is a fault in pacman.
That is a different problem....
The brasero-lite PKGBUILD should have provides=("brasero=2.26.0") in it. Sound-juicer requires "brasero>=2.26.0" so just providing brasero is not enough.
Allan
I believe this doesn't work either and the problems are at least related. Concrete example: lash-git: provides=('lash=0.6.0') calf-git: depends=('fluidsynth' 'libglade' 'lash>=0.6.0')
namcap calf-git-20090406-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz calf-git E: Dependency detected and not included (lash-git) from files ['usr/bin/calfjackhost'] calf-git W: Dependency included and not needed (lash)
As I said, we have two completely different problems here. Yours is a limitation of namcap and it would be good to file a feature request to get it fixed. The other "problem" is a PKGBUILD with incomplete provides encountering a versioned dependency. Completely different. Allan