On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:52:12AM +0100, Karol Woźniak wrote:
It seems that none cares after all, huh? But I still do want to do it as right as it can possibly be, mostly because I now need flake8 for both python 2 and 3. So if nobody complains, I'll go with my initial thought (see my previous post here) sometime near the end of the week.
I think flake8, python2-flake8 for the package names and flake8, flake82 for the executables is fine. flake82 looks a little unwieldy, but I don't think there's anything fundamentally wrong with that name. Maybe include a note in the .install or somewhere so that users know that it has been renamed. Someone else has picked up flake8-python3 since I orphaned it, so you may need to get him/her to drop it again. Allen