On Thursday 09 December 2010 00:45:33 Loui Chang wrote:
On Wed 08 Dec 2010 11:59 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Xyne <xyne@archlinux.ca> wrote:
Let's wait another day to get some more comments and incorporate any last changes. If it changes during the discussion period without unanimous consent then we would end up in a grey area when deciding which version to vote on (and we're limited by YES/NO proposals... haha).
Also if we are putting stuff like five day discussion section, seven day voting period, 66% quorum in the Standard Voting Procedure section, are we going to remove the redundant information in the other sections? As it stands now every section says 66% quorum. --Kaiting.
I would leave them period, but definitely leave them for at least another amendment.
Indeed. In most of the democratic organisations I've worked with, we'd usually agree one thing we wanted to change, then take a look afterwards to see how / if this impacted on other things, and change them to be consistent if needed. Pete.