I'd like to package another version of the AUR package android-sdk ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/android-sdk/), but without any content in `/opt/android-sdk`, solely for managing package dependency and misc files such as icon, desktop file and profile script. The real content of the package should be managed by user itself under `/opt/android-sdk`, outside of pacman. (This is a preference for some users like me.) Since it does not come with most of the package content, should I call it `android-sdk-fake`? But since it does come with the depenencies and misc files, it is not a "really fake" package. Should I go with `android-sdk-almost-fake` or something like that? -- 张海 浙江大学 计算机科学与技术 Blog: http://blog.zhanghai.me/ Github: https://github.com/DreaminginCodeZH