Hi again
1. removing it would cause a lot of breakage and issues not just for me but for all the people using my package and I feel like this was a nuclear out of nowhere solution instead of just contacting me and making suggesting instead of threating to have my package removed and should have been handled way better then this.
The 100% of the packages requiring libelectron-electron-meta are maintained by yourself so there wouldn't be any breakage, you should simply switch to the correct matching electron version. This dependency was added by you forcefully, it's not a strict requirements the application have. Reason 1 is invalid
2. I am one developer and this easily helps me maintain and control the electron versioning for all my software as I now use the repo packages of electron and the AUR if the package doesn't yet exist and if anything goes wrong or a update with electron causes any issues I can easily revert the version of just libelectron-electron-meta and fix the issues for all my packages instead of painstakingly go through each and every package and not have control of what version of electron my software uses
This reasons simply defines you use libelectron-electron-meta to eventually change the needed electron version without updating the packages, so at the actual state such package is 100% useless and you hope to use it the day the electron version would change, instead of updating your packages. To me this reason 2 is 100% invalid to keep the current libelectron-electron-meta package in the AUR. Please provide valid reasons to keep this package, if they exist, or change your packages dependencies to use the correct electron version (like all the electron packages - including the official one - do), drop the libelectron-electron-meta dependency or they will become broken when the libelectron-electron-meta package will be removed. Best regards -- Muflone