22 Aug
2010
22 Aug
'10
12:20 a.m.
On 22/08/10 05:57, David Campbell wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Dziedzic's message of 2010-08-21 14:51:51 -0400:
Hmm, I thought [namcap] was supposed to give a warning if it was an arch dependent package with no dependent on arch files. Take a look at what openoffice lang packs do (which are 'any') since I'm sure go-openoffice can do the same thing.
I submitted a patch[1] to do this check, but the patch does not appear to have been accepted yet.
[1]: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2010-August/015183.html
Yeah, sorry about the lack of response there... I have it flagged and on my TODO list, Allan