there are 2 main problems:<br>&nbsp;- Maintainer tag (which is mostly fixed already)<br>&nbsp;- Missing license (~70 packages)<br>Why I can not fix this issues and continue maintain my packages?<br>I think I can maintain it successfully.
<br><br>There are no opened bugs in FlySpray. There are 2 out-of-dated packages.<br>- kernel26-xen - proper patch for 2.6.23 kernel not found<br>- aqbanking - which have temporary build problems<br><br>Are you afraid the same as willysilly or try to reduce disk usage and mirror traffic?
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2008/1/17, Firmicus &lt;<a href="mailto:Firmicus@gmx.net">Firmicus@gmx.net</a>&gt;:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Alessio Bolognino wrote<br><br>&gt; The last thing: seriously, who the hell needs stuff like<br>&gt; cross-arm-wince-cegcc-libstdcppdll ? More than 500 packages owned by sergej have<br>&gt; less than 10 votes, so virtually useless.
<br>&gt;<br>&gt;<br>Sergej, why don&#39;t you move all of your packages that have less than,<br>say, 8 or 10 votes to unsupported and/or orphan them? This will bring<br>the number of packages you maintain in community to a more reasonable
<br>figure and will help calm down the, IMO very understandable, irritation<br>that is being addressed at you here. I think what we are asking you is<br>clear: besides fixing the issue with the missing maintainer and license
<br>tags, please DO REDUCE the number of packages you maintain in community!<br><br>François<br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>