Den 26-06-2015 kl. 02:21 skrev Hugo Osvaldo Barrera:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015, at 12:50, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Doug Newgard <scimmia@archlinux.info> wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 12:15:01 -0300 Hugo Osvaldo Barrera <hugo@barrera.io> wrote:
Why not just name them the same locally?
That creates problems verifying the checksums.
What problems exactly?
If you build both versions (which is the default for `makepkg` IIRC), you will need to delete the downloaded source midway through or makepkg will complain that "$pkgname-$pkgver" (x86_64) doesn't match its checksum (if it downloaded i686 first). Some people also utilise the $SRCDEST setting in makepkg.conf to avoid having to download source files over and over, which is useful if you need to build the same package for several machines. If you happen to have machines of multiple architectures, you will also have to keep deleting the source file to allow makepkg to fetch the architecture one for the machine you're currently building on/for. There are probably more cases where this would clock in. The summary is what Doug originally wrote though. Just Don't Do It™. -- Namasté, Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen <http://freso.dk/> AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Freso Wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Freso