On 01/18/2018 03:02 PM, Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general wrote:
It's only 4 commits since 0.3.0, two of them being critical fixes. I could backport those two commits (just tried: no conflict); it feels needlessly pedantic however, compared to using "master" straight away.
I've contacted the developer, see if he replies within a few days. If not, I'll go ahead with the patches.
If upstream has abandoned the project for years without tagging a stable release, then I would feel totally okay about taking my own prerogative to evaluate if master is stable, and if so, package the latest