On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 19:22 +0200, Ulf Winkelvos wrote:
On 10.09.2010 19:07, Christoph wrote:
On Friday, 10 September 2010, 17:40:35 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
It looks like in this case the content of the portable zip is identicaly (just about) to the content of the deb, just that the debs are arch-specific.
That describes the situation very well. Moreover, the debs contain a .desktop and a .png file, whereas the zip file does not, and the zip version looks for the configuration file in some sub-sub-subfolder, not in /etc.
Christoph
You should consider option 4, like Philipp suggested, until then i don't see how option 2 should be any better than option 3.
Ulf You mean besides the fact that 'debs are evil-er than zips'?
Something about that 'data' folder is really bad =)