On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 18:14:01 +0100 Xyne <xyne@archlinux.ca> wrote:
PyroPeter wrote:
On 12/07/2010 05:36 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 12/07/2010 06:19 PM, Daenyth Blank wrote:
Wow he actually launched that bot? I thought it was a joke. It seemed so stupid that I didn't think anyone would take it seriously. That definitely opens up some other perspectives on the application...
dude, he said it will write a bot for aur. RIGHT NOW he has a bot for bugtracker and it doesn't send any emails, just write some text in the channel. nothing more, nothing less
I think he actually launched the AUR-bot: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8388 (first comment)
Some AUR users have posted on the list in response to the bot. I can't find the others right now but here's one:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2010-December/012330.html
Just to be clear, the bot does not insult anyone and it does state the reason for the comment rather than some ambiguous "ur pkg is full of fail, lol" comment.
My issue is that I consider the launch premature and overzealous and I'm seeking reassurance that in the future ongoing discussions will be considered before action is taken.
Still because of that quickshot I'll change my previous expectation to vote. Even a reassurance won't change that for this vote, probably for a future one but not for this. Sorry but once a application is passed the applicant has directly to show a responsible behaviour, TU stands for Trusted User not Trolling User. This is not meant as a direct insult, don't misinterprete it. Atsutane -- Jabber: atsutane@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4