Hi, stone-soup-title on AUR (first submitted Fri, 23 May 2008) existed before the stone-soup pkg (from the git log: 2010-09-12, stone-soup added from [unsupported], schuay). Since schuay didn't delete stone-soup-title from AUR and since stone-soup-title has conflicts=('stone-soup'), it seems like the package maintainers has been aware of the situation. The Arch Wiki states that: "The submitted PKGBUILDs must not build applications already in any of the official binary repositories under any circumstances. Exception to this strict rule may only be packages having extra features enabled and/or patches in comparison to the official ones. In such an occasion, the pkgname array should be different." Provided that stone-soup-title has additional features enabled, and schuay was fine with the existence of the AUR package at the time, I think it should be kept in AUR. -- Best regards, Alexander Rødseth Arch Linux Trusted User (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)