Hi bardo, On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:15 PM, bardo <ilbardo@gmail.com> wrote:
So this means that the two systems can't coexist... I can't say I like it (I may prefer to use a particular sound system for a certain feature the other one misses) but at the moment I don't think there are other solutions.
There are plans to make them coexist (namely the cuckoo driver), but currently, yes, they can't coexist by now.
We'll have to talk about that file (maybe in private, I'm hijacking the thread and it isn't nice), in particular about the removal of libflashsupport, which is also provided in libflashsupport-pulse, a package I've been wanting to move to [community] for a while.
You are right, I was already thinking about that. I will contact you in private so we can think about a good solution. I was already thinking about splitting libflashsupport in a separate package anyway, because of the lib32-* dependency it would need to work in x86_64 architecture. --- Hi Jeff, On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Jeff Mickey <jeff@archlinux.org> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:41, Paulo Matias <matias@archlinux-br.org> wrote:
Surely I will only add it to [community] if I get explicit permission from the copyright holder (Tuomov), and if he confirms everything complies with the trademark license. As I said, I don't want to disrespect anyone's license.
You are not disrespecting the license of Ion3, you are just ignoring the decision that has already been made. Don't put ion3 in [community]. If a package is removed from [core]/[extra] because of a change in it's license, don't go putting it back in [community].
OK, sorry for misunderstanding, I thought the problem was only license-related. --- Best regards, Paulo Matias