On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 04:21:53PM +0200, hollunder@gmx.at wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:02:41 -0400 Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 03:45:43PM +0200, hollunder@gmx.at wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:34:03 -0400 Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:55:52PM +0200, hollunder@gmx.at wrote:
So this is a bug in yaourt, the second today it seems. Guess I start hunting for the yaourt and namcap bugtrackers..
When tracking down bugs please do not pollute your results by relying on unsupported scripts.
The problem is that even if those scripts are unsupported they are widely used (well, namcap not as widely a one could wish).
It should be clear if you saw the disclaimer on the AUR home page. I guess that could be a case to put the disclaimer on every page, so the point is hammered in. Heh.
Won't help ;)
What do you suggest? I could delete and/or block yaourt from AUR if there are too many support requests to Arch.
Does the AUR webpage and yaourt rely on namcap as well? Both don't get it right either.
AUR doesn't rely on namcap.
'+' bug for yaourt reported here: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14122?opened=4326
Jeez don't file bugs for unsupported scripts. Contact the yaourt developers. If you can't get a hold of them then there's nothing that the Arch Linux devs can do for you.