On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Xorg <xorgbreaker@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 05/07/2013 23:01, Maxime GAUDUIN a écrit :
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia <
palopezv@gmail.com> wrote:
On vie, 5 de jul 2013 a las 1:34 PM, Maxime GAUDUIN <alucryd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:22 PM, SJ_UnderWater <webmaster0007@rcn.com>
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia <
palopezv@gmail.com> wrote:
2013/7/3 Xorg <xorgbreaker@gmail.com> >
I will disown libkqueue in 2 weeks time provided there is no answer from niQo, then you can adopt it and we will proceed with the merge.
Cheers,
-- Maxime
Just a precision, the OP is Xorg. The ball is in his field. :-) (I have
no practical use for libkqueue myself, consider me last-resort adopter).
Don't worry, I was replying to SJ_UnderWater :P
Sorry to answer now. Yes, I have made this request, because I think (like Lukas) libkqueue0 is a duplicate package (from libkqueue, which is flagged out-of-date). I use libkqueue only as /darling-git/'s dependency. So I think SJ_UnderWater's package is the best package for libkqueue. Then, I read you, and I conclude the best solution is that niQo orphans his package, SJ_UnderWater adopts it and sends a new request to delete libkqueue0.
About libkqueue-svn, OK, I didn't know svn still exist. SJ_UnderWater, do you want to adopt it ? I'm not interested by, but I can adopt it in last-resort.
Thanks. X0rg.
It seems libkqueue{,-svn} was updated by niQo, but he didn't bother replying here. Oh well, merging libkqueue0 into libkqueue. -- Maxime