30 Sep
2025
30 Sep
'25
10:52 a.m.
El mar, 30-09-2025 a las 12:08 +0200, Dennis Herbrich escribió:
I've reproduced the issue [..]
Thank you both very much for your analysis. It is clear that the problem arises in the iteration of systemd-nspawn and go, but as you rightly point out, it is not clear which of the two should solve it. Let's see if someone with more knowledge can give us a hand.
The (somewhat sketchy) workaround I gave in my initial mail still stands though (while waiting for this systemd-nspawn + go process handling issue to be solved).
I'll have to check it out, but it could be a good workaround in the meantime.
Good luck, anyone else!
Thanks again! -- Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://ogarcia.me