On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Nathan O <ndowens.aur@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Nathan O <ndowens.aur@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Heiko Baums <lists@baums-on-web.de> wrote:
Am Sun, 5 Sep 2010 02:52:55 -0500 schrieb Nathan O <ndowens.aur@gmail.com>:
At this time, I am going through the ophaned packages and updating them to the latest versions and adopting packages(in my opinion this helps AUR out).
And this is why I don't think you should become a TU. Your deletion mania was a bit too big. You asked for package deletion obviously without reading the PKGBUILDs and other files in the packages and without comparing packages enough.
If you send a removal request to the mailing list as a normal user then a TU can first make sure if a package can indeed be removed, but if you were a TU then you could remove those packages by yourself without asking another TU first.
So I don't think you should be a TU until you proof that you learned reading PKGBUILDs and that you deal with packages not owned by yourself trustworthily. I don't see this, yet.
And I don't want my packages be removed from AUR just because you think they can be removed because of a pointless reason. See again your removal request for alevt and alevt-dvb. Packages are not the same just because a part of the package names is identical.
Heiko
I can understand your concern about deletion and I will work on that area.
Also I already knew that I wasn't ready to apply for a TU posistion yet. I mainly meant by sponsor as more as somebody that I could go to, to see if I did something correct or whatever. So don't concider my question as an application, atleast just yet :)
I have two questions:
1. Is it bad to adopt many packages to update them since they are orphaned(since somebody didn't want the package(s) anymore), if so why?
I don't see anything wrong with that, as long as you commit yourself to maintain them in a timely fashion.
2. On the note of deciding which packages to request to delete: I should mainly look at the PKGBUILDS that enable certain features than the other and does a package be concidered pretty much the same if the package uses something like, for example, ./configure --disable-scrollkeeper or things like that
I think that a package should get deleted if another package provides the exact same thing, otherwise it is a case by case matter imo.
Thanks
Cheers!