On 16 March 2012 20:55, Det <nimetonmaili@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mar 16, 2012 14:55, "Alexander Rødseth" <rodseth at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
The current maintainer, taylorchu, replied:
1. it uses no gconf, so you dont need gtk3. 2. it does not try to move and symlink. it is vanilla as provided by google.
Do you still request the package to be deleted?
Well, the symlinks can be removed as they are unnecessary nowadays (the man page and the .desktop _should_ still be installed), while 'no-gconf' could just as well be manually installed from the AUR beforehand, as it replaces 'gconf'.
Building 'openssl098' is the only thing that might bother some people. It could be moved to optional dependencies, since not everybody uses the built-in Pepper Flash anyway (which requires it).
At the _very least_, if this package was to be kept in the AUR (which I disagree with) the name should be changed to something like 'google-chrome-dev-no-gconf'. But using the same logic every single package in the AUR depending on 'gconf' could be cloned with '-no-gconf' alternatives.
Is _this_ what we want?
Det
I'll remove google-chrome-mini when the google-chrome-dev get's updated with the changes you mentioned. Lukas