On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 12:53:56 -0500 Kaiting Chen <kaitocracy@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Thorsten Töpper <atsutane@freethoughts.de>wrote:
I agree though I'd say 5 days has to be a minimum, everyone has a couple of days when something needs to be finished and where except for getting a few runs at the build server not much of the TU stuff can be done, same goes for some days sick in bed.
For falconindy's application the vote was decided in less than thirteen hours. --Kaiting.
And? Allan already brought up why this proposal is weak. Also not every- one around the world is up 24h, consider different timezones. Also the status of a vote has not to be known public till it's over so get your- self together. Shortening the voting period a bit: fine, cutting it as soon as there is something(Yes/No) does not make any sense, read the current bylaws read how inactivity is determined and then rethink about your proposal. -- Jabber: atsutane@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4