On 2021-08-19 23:05, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
We shouldn't postpone upgrading the aurweb server because of this. If some TU wants to maintain it, fine. But, for the actual deployment, I wouldn't use repo packages.
How you choose to deploy is only a little bit related. I can see the argument for wanting to pick libraries that are packaged by Arch if nothing else than just for the sake of the developers working on the project or test deployments or whatever. Even if the devops guys decide it's easier to maintain a deployment another way (as for example they do with GitLab that does not dogfood Arch's own packaging) that's fine. If it will serve the purposes of aurweb developers I'm happy to expedite it being in [community] and maintain it as the latest available upstream release. Caleb