So, the 45 days that lapsed since it's been flagged out of date isn't enough? Seems to me after 6 weeks, why bother? If not 6 weeks, what reasonable amount of time makes this step unnecessary? I want to fix the package, not deal with waiting on somebody else who may or may not get to it for another two weeks. Just a thought. On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Peter Lewis <plewis@aur.archlinux.org>wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 13 Jan 2012 03:01:52 Ernie Brodeur wrote:
The package charles-3.6.3-1 has been flagged out of date since nov 30th. I would like to adopt it, is it possible to get it disowned?
Please send an email to the maintainer first, asking them to update it, or if you can take over. If you don't receive a reply within a reasonable amount of time (e.g. two weeks), please come back to us with a request.
Thanks,
Pete.