On 04/22/2010 01:53 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:
Hi all,
Sincere apologies, I packaged a modified version of lablgtk2 and submitted it to AUR, without realizing the policy on naming. I've orphaned it, could someone please delete it? I've submitted a bug against lablgtk2 to change the compile options (as an aside, the extra version is broken right now anyway), and if that doesn't come through I'll resubmit as something like lablgtk2-opt (includes the optimized machine code objects of the library as well).
Many thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience! --G deleted. what i don't understand is why do you prefer to upload it in aur instead of fixing the one from extra. just fill a feature request and maybe the
On 04/22/2010 02:47 AM, Newtack Design wrote: maintainer will include optimized machine objects or whatever you do there.
scrap that. i just saw http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19205 -- Ionut