Hi Justin, hi Lukas,
I flagged the listed packages out of date for you by using a script.
thanks a lot for your help!
Could you try to avoid uploading packages to the AUR that are already available in [extra] or [community]?
Yes, of course, that shouldn't happen. If you are aware of any packages left in AUR that collide with [extra] or [community], then please let me know. That kind of duplication is going to cause trouble, because people end up with an inconsistent installation. I've done a quick search and found the following packages on AUR, which are provided by extra/ghc, too, so I reckon they shouldn't be on AUR, right? |--------------------------+--------| | Package Name | AUR ID | |--------------------------+--------| | haskell-array | 21716 | | haskell-bytestring | 17970 | | haskell-cabal | 25443 | | haskell-containers | 19697 | | haskell-directory | 25399 | | haskell-filepath | 21717 | | haskell-haskell98 | 19698 | | haskell-hpc | 17922 | | haskell-old-locale | 21718 | | haskell-old-time | 25400 | | haskell-pretty | 21720 | | haskell-process | 21465 | | haskell-random | 21721 | | haskell-syb | 21263 | | haskell-template-haskell | 19699 | | haskell-time | 17900 | | haskell-unix | 21722 | | haddock | 7651 | |--------------------------+--------|
I've seen the "arch-haskell" user doing this a couple of times and got no response on AUR comments.
Yes, prompt and reliable communication hasn't been a distinguishing feature of the ArchHaskell project in the past. Take care, Peter