Re: [aur-general] package review request: gog-pyre

Also I think all previous cases of people using local:// in a PKGBUILD did not use "/filename", so we were happily parsing it as an authority. You've actually broken the aurweb in a practical way by actually caring about the RFC. :D

That's gratifying! This bug appears to affect only the aurweb's UI, and not makepkg, so I think it's safe to leave the package as-is. I'm going to re-read the relevant RFCs over the next few days to make sure I'm not barking up the wrong tree.