25 Apr
2009
25 Apr
'09
2:57 a.m.
Ray Rashif wrote:
Actually, it is distributed under the GPL, so that is techniqually fine...
Yes, but that is why I mentioned "author's intentions".
But the author also intends you to provide the source when you distribute binaries. That is why they used the GPL license. So I would pick that intention over the contradictory one... Allan