Hi On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@gmail.com>wrote:
Hi,
Please remove a number of unused versioned packages:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-fog-1.15/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-celluloid-0.14.1/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-celluloid-io-0.14.1/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-coderay-1.0.5/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-equalizer-0.0.7/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-excon-0.25.0/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-github_api-0.10.1/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-gssapi-1.0.0/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-httpi-0.9.0/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-mime-types-1.16/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-minitar-0.5.4/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-mixlib-config-1.1.2/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-moneta-0.6.0/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-multipart-post-1.2.0/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-net-ssh-multi-1.1.2/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-nori-1.0.0/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-puma-1.6.3/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-ridley-1.5.3/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-rubyntlm-0.1.1/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-wasabi-1.0.0/
Incorrectly named packages that should be removed as well:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-digital-ocean/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-exception-notification/
All nuked.
Thanks. A few more that I missed https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-excon-0.25/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-fog-1.15.0/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-memoizable-0.2/
please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-sdl/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-rubysdl/
What's the rationale behind this change? ruby-sdl is perfectly fine, ruby-rubysdl is just silly imho.
The gemname is 'rubysdl' http://rubygems.org/gems/rubysdl, the package name should be 'ruby-$gemname'. The question should go to upstream developers - why do they use "ruby" prefix in their gem names if the gems are for ruby only anyway.