5 Dec
2010
5 Dec
'10
5:20 p.m.
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 11:53 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Shacristo <shacristo@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Kaiting Chen <kaitocracy@gmail.com> wrote: One of the stated purposes of the quorum is to "ensure that TUs remain active in the job that they have taken on." Allowing circumvention of the quorum requirements will obviously undermine that.
TU's have a lot of different responsibilities. Prolonging a decided vote by six days to motivate or ensure that someone is active does not make sense to me. --Kaiting.
I would propose shortening the voting period then. I kind of like how the system is set up (not perfectly though) to remove the inactive TUs semi-automatically.