On 28-10-18, Daniel M. Capella wrote:
On October 28, 2018 2:42:31 PM EDT, Baptiste Jonglez <baptiste@bitsofnetworks.org> wrote:
On 28-10-18, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
(endless rambling)
Can we please stop this futile bike-shedding exercise? It does little outside of discrediting you and the Arch community as a whole.
I already said so in previous discussions, but I am still dismayed at your and Doug's tendency to aggressively gang up on anybody crossing your way, assuming from the start that they are lying bastards with devious motives, without ever questioning your own assumptions or actions. You desperately want to always be right and to always have the final word, but I'm sorry to say that life does not work this way.
Regarding the TU application itself, the discussion period is nearly over. Since the bylaws mention that the period lasts 14 "full days", I will open the vote tomorrow morning.
Baptiste
It's upsetting and embarrassing that the only staffer to stand against this behavior directly in the ML is the applicant's sponsor. This disrespectful behavior occurs all the time. Can we enforce our Code of Conduct or is it just for show?
Thank you Daniel -- I actually discover that we *do* have a code of conduct, this is good news: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Code_of_conduct#Code_of_conduct It seems to me that these three rules in particular are relevant in this case and were not respected: "Respect other users", "Do not flame" and "Be responsible". Baptiste