On Saturday 20 November 2010 23:37:55 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 17:27 +0000, Peter Lewis wrote:
On Saturday 20 November 2010 17:22:34 Florian Pritz wrote:
On 20.11.2010 17:56, Peter Lewis wrote:
So, the idea would be to keep dovecot in [community]
dovecot is in extra.
Yeah, dovecot is in extra, maintained by Andreas. Personally, I'd be even happier for pigeonhole to go in there too and for the two to be built together each version bump, but I don't have that power :-)
Just a user comment, it can get a bit frustrating when direct dependencies like these are in community/extra (different maintainers). vlc-pulse-plugin for example (though that's not a good example, its normally updated within 12 hours).
Maintaining together is a win, from my perspective =)
I agree, and if Andy wants to take on pigeonhole in extra, then that's fine with me :-) I think having pigeonhole in community like this is at least better than having it in the AUR, since people were losing mails if they didn't notice a dovecot upgrade and hence didn't recompile pigeonhole. Pete.