just as a note, python2-repoze-lru only dependency is python2-routes so there will be no need for python2-repoze-lru after these changes On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:19 PM, James Bulmer <nekinie@gmail.com> wrote:
Awesome,
so if you disown python2-repoze.lru, I will update the package and deploy (after lunch). Then we can disown / delete python2-repoze-lru once the new python2-routes has been deployed
Sound like a plan?
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Felix Yan <felixonmars@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi.
Earlier today I put a request in to disown python2-routes, I now need python2-repoze-lru which is a dependency of python2-routes. It had
On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 12:54:05 James Bulmer wrote: the
same owner and is the same situation of not being updated in the last 2 years.
Thanks again -- James
Actually I prefer "python2-repoze.lru" as the naming scheme, since it follows upstream, and most repoze packages in the AUR are named in this way (python2- repoze-lru being the only exception).
So I'll suggest to merge python2-repoze-lru into python2-repoze.lru, and disown python2-repoze.lru which didn't update for even longer, and the maintainer has half of his packages out-of-date.
What do you think?
Regards, Felix Yan