Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Ray Rashif <schiv@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 12 December 2010 11:39, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun 12 Dec 2010 04:21 +0100, Xyne wrote:
The following is a proposed replacement for the current SVP section of the TU bylaws:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Bylaw_Amendment&oldid=124557
The changes address several issues recently brought up on this list. Briefly, these include: * enabling a vote to pass in the absence of quorum when more than 50% of active TUs have voted YES * enabling a vote to fail in the absence of quorum when 50% or more of active TUs have voted NO * clarifying the text to eliminate ambiguities
Please see Kaiting's "[aur-general]Amendment" thread and Loui's "[aur-general][PATCH]tu-bylaws: Amend Standard Voting Procedure" thread for more details.
This message marks the beginning of the 5-day discussion period before the amendment is put to a vote.
Can we get that as a patch so I may apply it to the hosted version if the vote passes? The content should probably be on the mailing list as well.
We can compare-and-contrast better looking at a patch, so +1 to that.
yes, please provide a patch.
Ronald
In the time that it would take me to find sources and create a patch you could have easily provided one from the submitted text. If someone wants to point me to the relative source and describe the preferred format of the patch then I will waste some of my time to create it, but I will tell you now that I think the request itself is a bit ridiculous. It's plain text. *sigh*