Re: [aur-general] wwt-svn and wit-svn

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Antonio Lucas <antonioluccas@gmail.com> wrote:

hi,

wwt-svn[1] and wit-svn[2] are the same package. Both maintainers are active, and both packages get the latest version from svn of this package (even the packages containing a version on them). what do you guys do in this situations?

<http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37504>[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34239 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37504

abracos Antonio Lucas

I'm not sure which package should go; wit-svn has a more correct name, but wwt-svn was uploaded first and has more votes. I'm CC'ing the respective maintainers so they can decide which package we should keep. :]