If look to the pther packages (not java) the fewers who need a version
On Thu Sep 11 14:02:41 EDT 2014, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote: they
apend the versión at the endm so for consistency whit the all others packages I think is better keep the version at the end: <vendor>-<jre/jdk>-<version>: oracle/openjdk-jre-7/8
We can't do that, because our own upstream (the OpenJDK packager) alredy decided on it. To change it you're going to have to start a bug report/feature request on our own packages. If you can change _his_ mind, then we can talk about implementing that in the AUR as well. On Thu Sep 11 18:13:11 EDT 2014, Justin Dray wrote:
The fact that one naming convention or the other being chosen is still not the issue, it's the fact that in the interim there are *both* packages in there.
Yes, I get that you're eager to get whatever parties out of there ASAP, and sort it out later. Unfortunately, that's not how it's going to play out and this discussion so far has prevented the proper way from happening as well, as I was already pointed out some time ago. Therefore, I'm taking this and my suggestions back directly to the respective maintainers, and only if they want to continue it here, we will. Det