Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] Adding AUR packages to [community] packages' provides

On 25 February 2011 19:12, Lukas Fleischer <archlinux@cryptocrack.de> wrote:

Seriously, we should be consistent here.

I agree. * Provide/replace/conflict as necessary when promoting a package from AUR (eg. when renaming the package) * Bump pkgrel OR force (I vote for force) for the first time (eg. so users get the repo versions and not report bugs many days later while still using the AUR package) * Do NOT provide/conflict/replace just because of a FR for a package in AUR (unless the request is to provide for a package name that is aknowledged by many)