stefan-husmann@t-online.de wrote:
-----Original Message-----
  
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:47:16 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] my first AUR contribution
From: "Henri Häkkinen" 
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
    

  
Hello all

I'm making my first AUR contribution and I would like to get
feedback on this before I will upload it.

I'm making a minimal version of the popular IM client
'pidgin'. This will be called 'pidgin-mini' and its
somewhat similar to 'pidgin-light'. pidgin-mini will have all
additional features removed to the bare minium, including development
header files, pkgconfig and aclocal scripts. You can review the
package file at:

http://nor.fi/~henrih/archlinux/pidgin-mini.tar.gz [1]

-- 
Henri 'henux' Häkkinen

 

Links:
------
[1] http://nor.fi/~henrih/archlinux/pidgin-mini.tar.gz

    

Hello,

welcome among us packagers. Your PKGBUILD shows me that you did 
read the packaging guidelines and recent advices. 

There have always be discussions about adding a package hat already 
has a counterpart in some official repo. Normally such packages should 
not go to AUR and will be deleted. On the other hand we have
mplayer-nogui 
or such things. Maybe this package is another example from that rule.

IMHO in packages with many different configure options to choose some of

them and to leave ot others can be a contribution of its own.  

So I would say, go for it. But there my be other opinions.

Regards Stefan 
  

I agree, while some 'counterpart' packages definitely should be left out of AUR, something like this is probably worth posting!

Oh, and welcome aboard!

Ghost

Get Free 5GB Email - Check out spam free email with many cool features!
Visit http://www.inbox.com/email to find out more!