On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:02:41 -0400 Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 03:45:43PM +0200, hollunder@gmx.at wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:34:03 -0400 Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:55:52PM +0200, hollunder@gmx.at wrote:
So this is a bug in yaourt, the second today it seems. Guess I start hunting for the yaourt and namcap bugtrackers..
When tracking down bugs please do not pollute your results by relying on unsupported scripts.
The problem is that even if those scripts are unsupported they are widely used (well, namcap not as widely a one could wish).
It should be clear if you saw the disclaimer on the AUR home page. I guess that could be a case to put the disclaimer on every page, so the point is hammered in. Heh.
Won't help ;)
Namcap is a supported script by the way.
I figured in the meantime :)
Does one know how to report bugs for namcap?
Arch Linux bug tracker: http://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=1&do=index&switch=1
Already reported: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14124?opened=4326 Does the AUR webpage and yaourt rely on namcap as well? Both don't get it right either. '+' bug for yaourt reported here: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14122?opened=4326 Best regards, Philipp