25 May
2021
25 May
'21
7:39 p.m.
On Tue, 25 May 2021 13:27:07 -0400, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
I beg to differ, as 'trivial' is subjective.
In an ideal world nobody would care about vanity, glory and/or money and all would be happy, if intellectual property would be completely unimportant. Often the wording of a law can't fulfil the spirit of a law. However, to distinguish between different approaches I do understand, that an upstream developer is in favour of a renamed fork, but OTOH seemingly "Scots have more words for snow than Inuit". Giving each slightly modified distributed software another name, might not necessarily help to distinguish between really important different approaches.