On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 at 09:56:18, Attila Bukor wrote:
On 07/08/2014 06:27 PM, Steven Honeyman wrote:
The trouble is there are too many people that don't (or can't) think about *why* something might not be working. It's often the users' fault :)
Suppose someone sets ld.gold as their default linker "because the internet told them it was better"... and then tries to compile imagemagick...
Steven.
What if it would be a vote-like structure and one reporter wouldn't be enough to flag it as not working?
Dan suggested something similar some time ago [1] and I quite like that idea. One "Mark package broken" button and an option to sort package search results by the number of users that marked a package.
r1pp3rj4ck
[1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2011-June/001698.html