Sorry for this off-topic side note, I want to clarify that the issue I tried to address is that some AUR users didn't read the comments and continued writing long comments with wrong assumptions. When pacman was upgraded, a dependency of yaourt needed to be compiled against the the new libalpm. Inexperienced users made wrong assumptions and continued to repeat the same wrong assumption, while it was more than once explained what actually happened. I consider it a "misuse" that the comments were used like a forum thread. I was less upset about the flagged package and I don't know who flagged the package. If I use yaourt to update, it displays comments in the terminal and it makes sense to have a few clear comments instead of long assumptions repeating again and again something that is wrong, while already was explained what actually happened. AUR commets shouldn't be used in a confusing, unclear way as askubuntu.com. Everybody could make a mistake, but a group of people doing the same mistake again and again is strange and requires education (not punishment).