Re: [aur-general] Should "base" packages be listed as dependencies?

On 03/29, LoneVVolf wrote:

It looks like many here haven't looked at base group in a while, or don't distinguish between base group and core repository.

example : systemd-sysvcompat is in base, systemd is NOT . Both are in core repo .

LW

systemd-sysvcompat depends on systemd (obviously), thus systemd is effectively part of the base group. So I don't really get your point? -- PGP ID: 0xC8F0B2F4