13 Nov
2016
13 Nov
'16
9:42 a.m.
On 11/13/2016 02:33 AM, Det via aur-general wrote:
I decided it would be good to ask the mailing list directly, should "pepper-flash" [1] be renamed to e.g. "flashplugin-ppapi"?
No. That has historically been the name. Anyone who is already familiar with flash on Liunx is likely to use "pepper" as a search term. Coincidentally, searching for "chromium-pepper-flash" (provides) using a keyword search in AUR Web does not give any results. I would have suggested requesting another provides as a compromise, but it seems that doesn't work as expected. Should it? --DJ