On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 13:29 -0500, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote:
## Issues * Existing Trusted Users are not followed closely in their actions, and the quality of some packages for instance is more than questionable. Do you have several example to show? * New applications are not carefully reviewed, and a several TUs seem to just vote “Yes” by default. From which facts are this assumption is built from? * There is a general feeling of decreasing/not high enough quality in the packages provided in the community/ repository. Idem. What elements do you have to support this feeling ? * The implication of some TUs in the distribution is very limited outside of packaging. What's wrong with that? Regards,
Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer